Manchester 0161 832 2500   |   London City 0204 505 8080   |   London Finchley 020 8349 0321

Secure Payment
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Accreditations
    • Social Responsibility
  • Specialisms
    • All Specialisms
    • Commercial & IP
      • Commercial & Intellectual Property
        • Visit Overview
      • Terms and Conditions of Business
      • Commercial Agreements
      • Intellectual Property
    • Commercial Litigation
      • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
        • Visit Overview
      • Contentious Probate and Trust Solicitors
      • Private Wealth & Trusts Disputes
      • Company & Shareholder Contract Disputes
      • Intellectual Property Dispute Solicitors
      • Insolvency Disputes
      • Injunctions
      • Property Litigation
      • Employment Litigation
      • Professional Negligence
      • Injury & Accident Claims
      • Clinical Negligence
      • Judicial review
    • Corporate
      • Corporate
        • Visit Overview
      • Restructuring and Reorganisation
      • Raising Finance
      • Selling Your Business
      • Joint Ventures
      • Company Advice
      • Management Buy-Outs and Buy-Ins
      • Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs)
    • Employment
      • Employment
        • Visit Overview
      • Employers
      • Employees
      • HR Professionals
      • In-house Lawyers
      • Entrepreneurs
    • Family
      • Family
        • Visit Overview
      • Divorce, Separation & Dissolution
      • Civil Partnership Dissolution
      • High Net Worth Divorce Solicitors
      • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Post Nuptial Agreements
      • Cohabitation Law Solicitors
      • Mediation Solicitors
      • Collaborative Law Solicitors 
      • One Lawyer Two Clients
      • Arbitration
      • Arrangements for Children
      • International Family Law
      • Domestic Abuse
      • Surrogacy & Fertility
      • Anglo-Swedish Legal Advice
    • Private Client
      • Private Client
        • Visit Overview
      • Wills
      • Grant of Probate
      • Charity Setup
      • Lifetime Gifting
      • Lasting Powers of Attorney
      • Intestacy
      • Insolvent Estates
      • Statutory Wills
      • Trusts
      • Trusts for Children
      • Inheritance
    • Property
      • Property
        • Visit Overview
      • Commercial Conveyancing
      • Commercial Leasing
      • Commercial Property
      • Lease Extensions
      • Property Finance
      • Residential Conveyancing
      • High Net Worth Residential Conveyancing
      • Buy To Let Conveyancing Solicitors
    • Secured Lending
      • Secured Lending
        • Visit Overview
      • Residential Loans
      • Development Loans
      • Commercial Property Loans
      • Portfolio Loans
      • Overseas Borrowers
      • Bridging Loans
  • Our Team
  • News, Insights & Work
    • News & Insights
    • Case Studies
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Contact Us
Employment Law

Nov 2021

Annual Leave Frequently Asked Questions

Home | News & Case Studies | Annual Leave Frequently Asked Questions

We often receive queries from clients about annual leave problems. So, in our latest article, we decided to answer your most frequently asked questions on employee holidays and leave.

Q1. I have an employee who is off on long-term sick leave are they able to carry over their unused annual leave to the next annual leave year?

The short answer to this is yes. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that a worker on long-term sick leave who is unable or unwilling to take statutory annual leave may be permitted to carry over that leave into a subsequent year. As to how long they can carry this over, following a series of cases dealing with this very issue it now seems likely that 18 months (from the end of the relevant leave year) will be adopted by employers as a sensible period of carrying over when an employee is on long term sick leave.  

Q2. I have a number of employees who at the end of each annual leave period have not used all of their holiday entitlement. Do I have to remind them that they should take this time off or will it lapse?

The ECJ cases of Max-Planck Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenscheaften eV v Shimizu and Kreuziger v Berlin, which were decided at the same time, highlighted the need for employees to be given an effective opportunity to take their annual leave. As a result, it is for an employer to show that they have warned their employees that they should take any outstanding leave, to avoid the risk of losing that leave at the end of the annual leave year.

The ECJ in the above cases pointed out that as the employee is the weaker party in the employment relationship, the employer must not restrict their rights. In particular, they should not be deterred from exercising their right to take annual leave by the possibility of suffering detrimental consequences, nor should they be offered any incentive or encouragement not to take their leave. 

In order for an employer to show that it has met its obligations, the ECJ recommends that the employer should take positive steps to encourage employees to take annual leave such as ensuring employees have the opportunity to take their annual leave, even if you have to encourage them formally. Make sure you inform employees in good time, and in writing as evidence, that if they do not take their annual leave when it is coming to the end of the period for them to do so. Ensure you have a clear “use it or lose it” policy, that there is a clear procedure for booking annual leave and that everyone is aware of this procedure. 

Q3. I have an employee who has been off on sick leave for 8 months. They have accrued a large amount of annual leave and have asked me if I can make a lump sum payment to them in lieu of the holiday. Can I make this payment?

Payments in lieu of annual leave are not allowed to be made during employment. Statutory holiday entitlement cannot be replaced by a payment in lieu, other than in circumstances where an employee’s employment is terminated (Regulation 13 (9) WTR). Therefore, it would be a breach of this legislation to pay the employee rather than allow them to take their annual leave.

The other option of course is to give the employee the choice to take the annual leave while they are on sick leave and then he will be paid for it. However, this is only really worthwhile if the employee is not getting sick pay.

Q4. I want to reward employees with long service with additional days of annual leave but I am concerned that this may indirectly discriminate against younger employees who do not have an established length of service and so will not be entitled to the same benefit. Can I do this?

Having an arrangement where an employee’s annual leave entitlement increases with the length of service is not unusual. These arrangements are usually contractual and work with an employee having a certain level of leave, which increases after say 5 years. Although these arrangements are common, could they be indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of age?

Age discrimination in employment is prohibited under the Equality Act 2010. Therefore, an employer must not (without justification) discriminate (directly or indirectly) against an employee because of age in respect of their terms of employment or by subjecting them to any other detriment. Indirect discrimination could arise if an employer increases annual leave for longer-serving employees. If an employee’s contract provides that annual leave will increase after ten years’ service, for example, this may be indirectly discriminatory because younger employees are much less likely than older employees to have ten years’ service, the longer the service required then the greater the chances of younger employees being at a disadvantage.

Schedule 9, Paragraph 10 of the Equality Act 2010 contains an exception to deal with this very issue to allow employers to reward length of service, even if it does disadvantage younger employees. This exception enables employers to treat employees differently with respect to awarding benefits if the reason for the difference in the treatment is that the disadvantaged employee has less than five years of service. In respect of employees who have more than five years of service and are put at a disadvantage by the service requirement, then an employer has to show that it ‘reasonably appears’ to it that imposing the length of service requirement ‘fulfils a business need.’ In these circumstances, the requirements to objectively justify such practice are less onerous than in most other cases of indirect discrimination.

Q5. If an employee suffers a bereavement, do I have to give them time off work or can I make them take some bereavement leave from their annual leave entitlement?

At present, there is no right to take paid time off due to a bereavement. However, there are exceptions for parents suffering from child bereavement.

Many employers will have their own compassionate leave policy to govern the issue of the time off that can be taken to deal with this. If the time off required exceeds that which is provided for by the policy then you will have to consider this on a case-by-case basis. Everyone deals with grief differently. Be mindful of the longer-term consequences following the trauma of the death of a loved one. Mental health issues such as depression and PTSD can be long-term medical problems and may amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010. Be compassionate and see what you can do to support an employee on their return to work following a bereavement, perhaps you can offer flexible working or a phased return to work.

From 6 April 2020, however, this has changed in some cases with the introduction of the Parental Bereavement Pay (General) Regulations 2020. This means that an employee who loses a child under the age of 18 or suffers a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy, will be entitled to two weeks of statutory leave to be taken in one block or as two separate blocks of a week. The leave will be paid for employees who have at least 26 weeks of service and who meet minimum earnings criteria. Statutory parental bereavement pay will be paid at the same rate as statutory paternity pay (£151.20 from April 2020) or 90% of weekly earnings if lower.  

Q6. I have received a request for annual leave from an employee, at what is my company’s busiest time of the year. I would therefore normally refuse such a request. However, their request relates to the employee’s requirement to observe a religious festival. What should I do?

There is no legal requirement for an employee to give a reason why they want to take a holiday. However, if they do state that the reason they wish to take their annual leave relates to religion and belief, and permission is refused, then, as an employer, you must be able to justify your decision by reference to reasons unrelated to the employer’s religion or belief. In other words, any refusal must be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Discrimination (either direct or indirect) and harassment in the workplace because of religion or belief are unlawful under the Equality Act 2010. Having a clear policy in place in respect of the timings of holidays and the processing of holiday requests will assist you in these situations.  

Contact BBS Law

If you are unclear on Employment Law and how annual leave may affect your business contact BBS Law to discuss your situation. You can call us on 0161 832 2500 or email to speak to one of our employment law specialists.


Share article:

Related Articles


Insight

How to get the most out of your first meeting with your family solicitor – preparation is key

Read Family
News For Women Scotland

Supreme Court Rules on Definition of “Woman”

Read Employment
Case Study

Ballingdon Hall: Financing in a Historic Property’s Journey

Read Secured Lending
SCROLL FOR MORE

Sign-up for our newsletter

Name(Required)
Untitled(Required)

Contact Details


Please submit careers applications using the link below

Careers Application: Submit

For proactive, lateral thinking and cost-effective legal advice, contact us to discuss your needs.

Email: [email protected]

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

On the 1st of October 2022, BBS Law acquired OGR Stock Denton Solicitors. OGR Stock Denton were a prominent North London based law firm with more than half a century’s experience assisting individuals and businesses with various legal issues. Many of the solicitors at OGR Stock Denton previously worked in either the West End of London or the City of London. The acquisition of OGR Stock Denton by BBS Law significantly increases the London presence of BBS Law and allows OGR Stock Denton’s clients access to BBS Law’s expert solicitors, previously based solely in Manchester and the City of London and now based at all three locations.


On the 1st of April 2024, BBS Law acquired Manuel Swaden Solicitors. Manuel Swaden were a prominent North West London based law firm known for its expertise in property and private client matters. This strategic move will fortify BBS Law’s position in these areas of practice and enhance its ability to serve clients with excellence and efficiency.

Manchester: 0161 832 2500

Fax: 0161 834 4826

First Floor, The Edge, Clowes Street, Manchester, M3 5NA

Download Directions

London City: 0204 505 8080

Fax: 0161 834 4826

Ground Floor, 80 Coleman Street, London, EC2R 5BJ

Download Directions

London Finchley: 020 8349 0321

Fax: 0161 834 4826

2nd Floor, Winston House, 2 Dollis Park, London, N3 1HF

Download Directions

Logo
  • Careers
  • Compliance
  • Estate Administration Costs
  • Employment Dismissal Costs
  • Debt Recovery Costs
  • Conveyancing Costs
  • Re-mortgaging Costs
  • Complaints Handling Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Staff Area

© 2025 BBS Law Ltd (registered number 07202211) is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under Number 556112. London City office SRA authority no: 8008216. London Finchley office SRA authority no: 8002172.
Managed by Full Send.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkDeny