BBS Law’s litigation lawyers advise on all aspects of property and real estate disputes, for both commercial and residential properties.
Contact UsManchester 0161 832 2500 | London City 0204 505 8080 | London Finchley 020 8349 0321
Secure PaymentBBS Law’s litigation lawyers advise on all aspects of property and real estate disputes, for both commercial and residential properties.
Contact UsIf you are involved in a dispute over real estate or property, you may need legal advice from our property litigation teams.
BBS Law’s litigation lawyers advise on all aspects of property and real estate disputes, for both commercial and residential properties.
We have a diverse portfolio of clients and can assist with all aspects of landlord and tenant litigation, or in any property dispute. We approach all disputes proactively and pragmatically, aiming to resolve disputes or achieve our clients’ needs by negotiating, mediating, or litigating, depending on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Whatever the nature of your property dispute, our specialist property team offer an experienced and cost-effective service.
Property litigation involves a range of legal issues, but encapsulates revolving disputes that are related to real estate property. This could include disputes between landlords and tenants, ownership or lease dispute on agreements; it can also involve larger scale disputes such as property rights or development and construction.
Our property litigation teams can help you with the likes of court proceedings, negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and other forms of dispute resolution, all with the aim of solving issues swiftly and professionally.
Property litigation encompasses a diverse range of dispute resolution. Commonly, the kind of disputes included under the umbrella of property litigation are landlord-tenant disputes, which may involve issues such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, eviction proceedings, or disputes over maintenance and repairs.
Boundary disputes are another commonality, arising when property owners disagree about the location or ownership of property. Other types of disputes may involve breaches of contract, disagreements over property titles, disputes regarding easements or rights of way, disputes between co-owners or neighbours, and challenges to property development or planning permissions.
Whatever it is, we aim to ensure that it results in an organised dispute resolution with our help.
Often, a commercial Lease will include a break clause allowing the tenant or landlord to terminate the Lease early.
Depending on how the Lease is drafted, the right to exercise the break clause may arise on a specified date or it may be exercisable at any time during the term on a rolling basis.
It is common for a break clause to be conditional. For example, a tenant may have to perform certain obligations to exercise the right of the break clause.
Failure to meet the conditions may mean that the Lease continues and the tenant has ongoing liabilities associated with the Lease.
Adhering to the conditions of the break clause can be extremely strict, and can impose time consuming and financial liabilities on the tenant. One example of a failure on behalf of a tenant to meet the strict requirements of a break clause, and where the Court held that the tenant had not complied, was the almost ludicrous fact that the tenant had applied two layers of paint as opposed to three as stipulated in the Lease.
The court’s insistence on extremely strict compliance with the requirements of a break clause demonstrates how important it is to keep fully aware of the terms of the break and any time limits that may apply. Given the significant sums that may be involved it is imperative that both landlords and tenants take legal advice on their rights and obligations.
Further examples of common conditions found in break notices are:
We can advise on any break notice claims you may have. The starting point will be to consider the terms of the Lease and an assessment of the factual position. We will work with you to determine the next steps and seek the most appropriate resolution for you, be this through settlement or formal litigation through the court.
Unfortunately, there is no way of determining the length of time that it would take to resolve commercial or residential property disputes. Property litigation matters that can be solved swiftly if settlements are reached, can also go on for a some time, some even years before a solution is found and both parties reach an agreement.
Nonetheless, this is dependent on the situation at hand and can change dramatically on a case by case basis. That being said, it is important to consult legal help from the likes of us at BBS Law for guidance on property litigation matters so you can better understand your options.
Commercial rent arrears recovery (“CRAR”) replaces the old common law doctrine of distress. It allows a landlord to recover rent arrears by seizing the tenant’s goods and holding or selling them.
Under the old rules of distress, landlords had the right to catch tenants by surprise since no prior notice or court order was needed. This was an effective tool for landlords, and meant that tenants could not effectively hide and put assets out of the landlord’s reach. Under the CRAR regime, landlords are required to follow a stringent process and adhere to strict procedures.
CRAR can only be used to recover principal rent together with any associated VAT or interest. It does not apply to services charge, rent premiums or other outgoings. Even before CRAR can be exercised, there needs to be a minimum rent arrears period equivalent to seven days’ rent. It is important to note that initiating CRAR may mean the landlord has waived its entitlement to pursue an alternative remedy, such as forfeiture.
The tenant has the right to apply to the court for an order that no further steps may be taken under CRAR without further permission of the court.
CRAR can apply be exercised by the immediate landlord under a lease and only applies to a property that is wholly commercial, meaning it cannot be a mixed-use property. Any goods owned by the tenant can be seized, except work tools with an aggregate value of £1,350.00.
A landlord can still require a sub-tenant to pay directly to him for the default of the landlord’s tenant. However, this involves a separate procedure with notice requirements to follow.
We advise obtaining legal representation if you are considering initiating the CRAR procedure.
We will discuss whether this is the most appropriate remedy bearing in mind your circumstances and aims.
It is usually the responsibility of a landlord, management company or management agent to collect service charge from leaseholders, ensuring the efficient running of the property. When a leaseholder is not paying service charge, we understand that the pressure from creditors who have supplied services to the property and cash-flow issues can be a worry.
Like any other debt collection procedure, formal litigation is not always the best avenue to proceed. We will liaise with the debtor, mortgage providers (if one) and any other third parties to seek a cost effective and speedy resolution. If the matter does not reach a resolution, court proceeding may be necessary and we will represent your interests throughout.
In any event, the process of collecting unpaid service charge can become complicated and protracted, and it pays to have specialist legal representation. Each case is different, but we usually follow the following procedure to put the debtor on notice that the issue is serious.
We have the experience and expertise in service charge collection to help you recover any outstanding fees owed to you.
We provide advice to both commercial landlord and tenants, and also act for management companies, property developers, investors and managers. Our team handles both commercial and residential disputes, and we seek to determine the best method for resolving disputes, be it negotiation, mediation or formal litigation.
Being sensitive to the needs of both landlord and tenants, we will do our utmost to keep healthy relationships between both parties. In the event that this is not possible, we are dedicated to achieving the best results for our clients and are sensible regarding costs, whilst providing an excellent service in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Our experienced team can also advise on non-contentious issues, such as reviewing and drafting leases, licences, conveyancing services and other property or portfolio needs. We have excellent market knowledge and will utilise our skills and expertise in advising you.
Under Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925, a landlord may initiate forfeiture of a lease for breaches of covenants. This means the landlord is seeking to either peacefully re-enter the property or initiate court proceedings for possession of the property. In essence, the landlord is terminating the Lease.
The lease will need to expressly state that there is a right of forfeiture and the clause will need to stipulate as to the alleged breach. A breach of the covenants in a commercial Lease may occur in the following circumstance
If the property is residential or mixed use, the right of forfeiture is conditional on receiving a court order. If an order is not sought, and re-entry takes place, the landlord may be liable for a fine or even imprisonment. Similarly, forfeiture will not be available without a court order if a tenant has fallen into an insolvency situation.
Forfeiture represents a positive and final act, and once initiated by the landlord, cannot be undone. It is important that the intention to forfeit the Lease is communicated by the landlord to the tenant. From the tenant’s point of view, the Lease has not been brought to an end until the court order, and in circumstances the tenant can enforce the landlord’s repair obligations.
The landlord has to be careful that he does not initiate forfeiture before a breach has occurred by the tenant. In these circumstances the tenant can make an application to the court for damages or an injunction allowing the tenant back into the property.
It is important to follow the correct procedure or the consequences for the landlord can be severe. We recommend that professional advice is sought and you aware of your rights and obligations. In some cases, a landlord can actually waive the right to forfeit. This can occur when a landlord is aware of the breach and performs an act which recognises the lease as continuing.
From a practical point of view, considerations as to whether the premises can be re-let quickly, the current business rates and the availability of alternative remedies should assist in determining what action to take.
Our property litigation services include:
Property litigation involves resolving disputes between property owners and their tenants, but can also cover a wide range of matters involving the ownership of residential and commercial property. Property litigation covers all disputes relating to the buying, selling, leasing and ownership of property.
Property disputes are regularly resolved via negotiation or alternative dispute resolution such as mediation. If these strategies are unsuccessful, the dispute may progress to litigation within the courts or tribunal.
Most landlord and tenant disputes are resolved through effective communication with each party trying to resolve the dispute amicably. Any agreement reached in this regard should then be set out in writing.
If resolving the issues amicably is not possible, then issues in dispute should be documented in writing. This should be specific and accurate so that those communications can then be used as evidence at Court.
If the dispute cannot be resolved in correspondence a impartial third party mediator can be instructed to assist the parties with resolving the dispute.
As a last resort the parties can issue Court Proceedings.
Grounds for possession can vary depending on whether you are seeking possession of a residential or commercial property. The most common grounds for possession are rent arrears, damage to the property and causing a nuisance to neighbours (anti-social behaviour)
This rule relates to adverse possession of land (a method of acquiring title to land as against all others, including the registered owner) To adversely possess land, you must show you have maintained the land in question for a minimum of 10 or 12 years, depending on whether the land is registered.
For most cases the landlord will have 6 years to bring a claim and 12 years in circumstances relating to a lease executed as a deed.
There are several options available to landlords to recover rent arrears depending on whether those arrears relate to commercial or residential property.
In respect of commercial property, we would advise the landlord as a first step to instruct High Court Enforcement Officers via the Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery procedure which is the most cost-effective way to recover rent arrears. If this is unsuccessful the landlord can consider forfeiting the lease or issue court proceedings to recover the sums due.
In respect of residential property, the landlord can serve a notice pursuant to Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 which requires the tenant to pay the arrears within 2 weeks or 2 months (depending on the level of arrears) or face eviction. Alternatively, the landlord can issue court proceedings
A claim for dilapidations dispute is a claim that a landlord has against a tenant of commercial property for failing to comply with the repair obligations within the lease. When bringing a claim in this regard the landlord is required to follow the Pre-Action Protocol for Claims for Damages in Relation to the Physical State of Commercial Property at Termination of a Tenancy (the ‘Dilapidations Protocol’).
We take the time to get to know our clients and their businesses, and we work collaboratively with them to achieve their goals.
Meet Our TeamsHaving recently worked with BBS Law to successfully conclude an Intellectual Property infringement case we were extremely happy with the services they provided.
David Bondt expertly guided us through the process and mediation, providing knowledgeable, professional and commercial support at all stages – thanks again David!
During a very difficult period in our business, we had to seek the help of a professional Law firm. We selected BBS Law Ltd following initial calls with Andrew Haffner and the Litigation Team. The support and unbiased guidance given by Andrew and the team guided us through many nightmare events. The extensive knowledge and professional support given to the complexities of the problem were well understood by BBS Law Ltd.
I instructed David Bondt of BBS Law to deal with a complex intellectual property dispute. The other side were trying to be overly aggressive, but David and his team were able to deal with the situation professionally and robustly on my behalf. Needless to say, BBS Law obtained a very favourable outcome for us and gave very clear and concise advice to me throughout the case. I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend the litigation team at BBS Law.
High Court rules BBS’s client’s claim against HSBC should continue as an application for Summary Judgment and Strike Out by HSBC fails. David Bondt led the litigation team at BBS Law, who acted for the successful claimant in the recent…